Gilles Arnaud Bailly vs Thomas Faurel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Considering second serve points won, Faurel edges slightly ahead with 40.1% compared to Bailly's 39.32%. Does this small difference provide a significant advantage? Perhaps in a closely contested match.
• When it comes to breaking down their opponent's second serve, Faurel again demonstrates superiority, winning 46.41% of these points, whereas Bailly has 44.06%. Additionally, Faurel shows a stronger return on first serves as well, achieving 31.21% against Bailly's 28.6%.
• Under pressure, Faurel has been able to save 48.25% of breakpoints, compared to Bailly who saved 45.09%. This consistent ability to resist breakpoints might suggest resilience in tense moments.
• Despite Faurel's strengths in certain areas, Bailly boasts a superior overall match-winning percentage over the past year, securing victories in 68.06% of his matches, compared to Faurel's 59.26%.
• Both players excel on hard courts, but Bailly has a markedly better record, with a win rate of 69% compared to Faurel's 57%. Conversely, Bailly has more difficulty on indoor hard courts, notably lower than Faurel's performance.
• Analyzing the competitive level, Bailly exhibits a higher success rate in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 67.65% of matches, while Faurel has a slightly lower winning percentage at 58.14%.
• Interestingly, Bailly tends to perform better in resolving deciding sets, clinching 57%, whereas Faurel achieves only 35%, which might be pivotal during a tight match setup.
• In terms of breakpoint conversion rates, Bailly once again holds an advantage, converting 39.02% of opportunities, as opposed to Faurel's 35%.
• Faurel has faced more highly-ranked opponents on average, with adversaries carrying an average rank of 362.67, which is slightly tougher than Bailly’s average opponent rank of 376.21.

Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):

Given the current statistics and recent form, both players showcase significant strengths, but certain trends are notable. Faurel demonstrates commendable resilience in saving breakpoints, suggesting a toughness under pressure that could be vital. His small advantages in serve returns grant him marginal leverage in exchanges.

However, Bailly's overall superior win percentage, higher breakpoint conversion, and especially his performance in deciding sets indicate a player who frequently comes out on top in critical moments. Furthermore, Bailly's remarkable performance on hard courts gives him a considerable edge in a surface he clearly excels on.

When synthesizing these data points and factoring in match-day dynamics, Bailly appears to possess a slight upper hand, likely making him the favored competitor in this encounter. Therefore, Bailly is the predicted winner for this upcoming tennis clash.